Wallington Hall, the QE II - and a Canon 7D

Posted on 28 December 2009, 19:37

Thanks – as usual – to my buddy Mark Mowbray, today I visited Wallington Hall, a National Trust property about 12 miles west of Morpeth.

We’d been drawn to it by talk of a great feeding station that routinely attracts Bramblings, among other birds, and – Mark’s specific interest today – Red Squirrels.

What we found didn’t match expectations: the feeding station was dark and relatively far from the hide; the hide windows were frozen shut; and the feeders were completely empty!

Not a great situation: there were birds around – quite a few tits (mainly Coal, with Blue and Great in support), Robins, Blackbirds, Chaffinches and Nuthatches – and a Moorhen. That was it – no Winter thrushes, no Bramblings.

The birds were too far off and in awful light, so – as experiences go – it wasn’t a good one, and surely not the place to test my new Canon 7D!

Shame too, because (feeding station apart!) the light today has been glorious – beautiful Winter Sun being bounced around by the generous covering of snow over this part of Northumberland…

Hope springs eternal, however, so we had a potter around the rest of the estate and – in the Walled Garden – found some very obliging subjects in the form of friendly Robins:


Robin, Wallington Hall


Robin, Wallington Hall


Robin, Wallington Hall


Robin, Wallington Hall


Robin, Wallington Hall


Robin, Wallington Hall

And – rather strangely – a Moorhen:


Moorhen, Wallington Hall


Moorhen, Wallington Hall


Moorhen, Wallington Hall


Moorhen, Wallington Hall

Mark spotted this little lady high up in a tree: I wasn’t going to bother processing the file – honestly, it was miles away, a dot in the frame – but I’ve since worked it up and, y’know, it ain’t that bad…


Kestrel, Wallington Hall

Having “done” Wallington, we decided to call into the QEII lake on the way home so that I could test out the 7D’s new AF options on BIFs.

I failed dismally with the ducks, but that’s OK – I’m pretty sure I was using an AF mode that wasn’t suited to the task – although I did get some pretty sharp duck butts (I was too close)!

I did pick up a handful of nice Black Headed Gulls though:


Black Headed Gull, QEII Lake


Black Headed Gull, QEII Lake


Black Headed Gull, QEII Lake

About the 7D.

Files off the camera looked different to 40D RAWs – initially I thought they looked a bit softer, although I’ve since concluded that I’m wrong about that. Besides it’s a different camera. It’s important to remember this when evaluating a new camera.

So I had at ‘em anyway, using in my current favourite converter, Bibble 5.

I realised that different “capture” sharpening was needed – a higher default level (which I think makes sense) – but the files convert and process very nicely, and they do resolve a lot more fine feather detail than say, the 40D (these small web-sized shots don’t really show just how much feather detail I’m getting).

I was also very happy with how the 7D metered the snowy scenes – Evaluative worked nicely and I had no hot highlights in any images I took today.

Centre Point AF is brisk and positive and locks on very effectively – I don’t think I had a single OOF shot in this mode.

While the Auto Select All Points mode was great fun (you see the AF points follow the subject around the viewfinder) I didn’t get many impressively sharp images with the gulls and ducks at the QEII. I’m confident that I can improve on that though – and if not, I can always use Centre Point AF with AF Point Expansion mode, which is evidently excellent for flying birds.

At one point I was shooting a Rook flying past. It went behind a tree, and the AF tracked it perfectly, keeping focus on the bird even behind the twigs and branches: that was hugely impressive.

I used 400 ISO for most of my images today (higher ISO testing can wait until I’ve got used to the camera) and at 400, files are very clean.

Biiiiig files, though! Jpegs converted from the RAWs and saved at 100% are averaging 25 mb!

Finally, the LCD: what the hell is all the fuss about with these high-res LCDs? I’m just as happy looking at the LCD on the 40D, to be honest.

All in all then, I’m pretty pleased with how this first outing went: there’s a lot still to learn about the 7D, and I’m looking forward to pointing it at some waders.




What do you think?

  1. Brian Robson wrote on 31 December, 11:19 AM:

    Looking to be a good purchase Keith, will keep an eye out for future posts and photos.




  2. Keith Reeder wrote on 31 December, 12:09 PM:

    Hi Brian – thanks for that.

    I’ll be honest and say that these images, at this resolution/presentation, aren’t really that much different to what I see from my good old 40D – thre's a little more microcontrast and fine detail, but Bibble 5 is probably responsible some some of that. It’s looking at the images big where the difference in detail shows up.

    That said, if you were to believe the scuttlebutt on some websites about the 7D, then even these images would be impossible – it’s supposedly a soft, noisy camera, according to some “experts”..!

    I’ll hopefully be out and about with it between now and the end of the Festive season and I’ll give it a proper shake-down then.

    I’ve practically committed the entire manual to memory, so I know how to “drive” the thing now, and I’ll be able to concentrate on the pictures rather than the camera.




  3. Simon Phillpotts wrote on 18 January, 04:31 PM:

    Looks promising Keith, I think that improved AF will help Canon sell a shed load of these. I’ll keep an eye on your future thoughts as I miss a 1.6 crop body.

    Have you tried the video yet?




  4. Keith Reeder wrote on 18 January, 06:20 PM:

    The AF is pretty good Simon – although to be honest I never had any problems with my 40D’s AF.

    I’m certainly looking forward to pointing the 7D at some Farne Puffins in a few months though!

    Video is on my “To Do” list, but I don’t have any video editing software at the moment. I’ll get onto video when I’ve thoroughly got to grips with stills usage, I guess – there are still a few things about the camera’s behaviour I need to get to grips with (mainly around the various AF modes) – so video can wait a wee while.

    One thing I’ve satisfied myself about though - the high ISO performance really is as good as the hype suggests, if you make the right conversion and processing choices: I’ve got some proper low-light 6400 ISO shots (mucking about in some very shady, overgrown woodland yesterday) that have gobsmacked me, and 3200 ISO is trivially easy...




  5. Pete Walkden wrote on 24 January, 08:44 PM:

    Hi Keith – interesting to see you’ve upgraded to the 7D. I’ve considered it, and will be watching your progress with it over the coming weeks.

    Personally, I’ve been seeing the 40D back in action as my 50D has a fault with it, and it fails to power the IS in my 500mm F4…

    Shall be getting it repaired (I hope this week). Still not convinced by the 7D – might get a 1D Mk2 2nd hand instead.

    Oh, and get your gallery sorted, you’re far too selfish keeping all those good shots to yourself. ;-)

    Cheers,

    Pete.




  6. Keith Reeder wrote on 25 January, 12:15 AM:

    Hiya Pete, good to hear from you again!

    Hope you like the gulls!

    It’s obviously early days with the 7D, but I’m optimistic and impressed so far: I can’t wait for some decent light and some interesting birds to point the thing at.

    Sorry to hear that your camera jinx has struck again – perhaps you should send your 500mm f/4 to me for safekeeping while you get your camera fixed!

    I decided against a 1D Mk II myself quite a while ago after Mark Wilson told me that its AF – on the centre point anyway – was really no better than what we get from the 40D (his other body was a 40D at the time).

    Given that the 7D’s AF is better than the 40D’s (and it surely is – I’ve satisfied myself of that already), then logically it must give up nothing to the Mk II either.

    I know the 7D’s high ISO performance is better than the 1D MK II’s; and I have to say, the 7D's 18 mp does give you a lot of cropping options…

    All that said, I imagine that at lower ISO the Mk II's files will probably be a bit "smoother".

    I’ll get the gallery sorted some day, but I’m reworking a lot of shots to post up at 1000mm, and it’s taking a while.





my details

Formatting: _italic_ = italic, *bold* = bold.

  (Please note that all comments are moderated.)

Images, content and design © 2010 Keith Reeder                                                                                           A Textpattern website